268 So. 2d 92 - Warner v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2015
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tillery v. Fuller · Quinette v. Delhommer · Yuges Realty, Ltd. v. Jefferson Parish Developers, Inc. · Tracy v. Dufrene · Accardo v. Dimiceli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * It is well established that certain nullities attending tax sales are relative and are cured by the three and five year prescriptive periods provided by LSA-Const. art. 10, Sec. 11, and the statutes enacted by the legislature from time to time. Among these are failure to properly advertise ( Robinson v. Williams, 45 La.Ann. 485 , 12 So. 499 ): lack of notice ( Skannal v. Hespeth, 196 La. 87 , 198 So. 661 ); and sale for taxes which have prescribed ( Fellman's Heirs v. Interstate Land Co., 163 La. 529 , 112 So. 405 ). Defects which have been held to render tax sales absolutely null, and therefore, incurable by prescription, include prior payment of taxes and dual assessment ( Gremillion v. Daigrepont, La.App., 47 So.2d 363 ); lack of assessment ( Tillery v. Fuller, 190 La. 586 , 182 So. 683 ); inadequate description ( Yuges Realty v. Jefferson Parish Developers, 205 La. 1033 , 18 So.2d 607), and fraud ( Wall v. Hamner, 182 La. 1049 , 162 So. 769 ).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.