Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 SW 243 - Payne v. Smith

Payne v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 1961
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1961

7 state decisions

3019241930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Georgia Florida Alabama Railway Company v. Blish Milling Company · St Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. C a Starbird · Hines v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. · Bronstein v. Payne · Hyatt Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the facts and circumstances attending a particular shipment are in evidence, it is ordinarily a question of fact to be determined from a consideration of the same what a reasonable time for the delivery of such shipment would be. American Railway Express Co. v. Roberts [ 28 Ga.App. 510 , 111 S.E. 744 ], supra; Moore Bros. v. American Railway Express Co., 181 N.C. 300 , 107 S.E. 6 . While the usual and customary time required for the transportation and delivery of similar shipments is prima facie reasonable, the fact that the time occupied in transporting and delivering a particular shipment is unusual is not necessarily conclusive that such time was unreasonable. 10 C.J., p. 287.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.