Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 SW 988 - Woods v. Rolls

Woods v. Rolls’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 1936
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co. · National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Teel · New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinney · Holt v. Gordon · Camoron v. Thurmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any joint owner or claimant of any real estate or of any interest therein or of any mineral, coal, petroleum, or gas lands, whether held in fee or by lease or otherwise, may compel a partition thereof between the other joint owners or claimants thereof in the manner provided in the succeeding articles of this chapter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.