Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

268 S.W.3d 532

Landrian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 2008

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 2008-10-08

Relies on Blount v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-10-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Gardner v. State (2009), Cosio v. State (2011)

5 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

570200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WOMACK, J.,

¶1filed a concurring opinion, in which KELLER, P.J., and KEASLER, J., joined.

¶2Without implying that there is anything wrong with the Court’s analysis of the jury-unanimity issue, I should like to point out that there is no possibility of a non-unanimous verdict for this offense as it was alleged. If half the jury believed the defendant caused serious bodily injury, then they necessarily believed that a deadly weapon was used. A deadly weapon is anything that in the manner of its use was capable of causing serious bodily injury. See Penal Code section 1.07(a)(17)(B). It is impossible to inflict serious bodily injury without using a deadly weapon. We so held only a couple of months ago. See Blount v. State, 257 S.W.3d 712 (Tex.Cr. App.2008).

/268/sw3d/532 · .json · Public domain