Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 U.S. 121 - United States v. Dunn

United States v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis

268 U.S. 121 · 1925

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 12 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. State of West Virginia State of Ohio (1923), Garrett v. Co (1942)

47 federal appellate · 12 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 10 states

37019251930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kagama · Heckman v. United States · Tiger v. Western Investment Co. · Grymes v. Sanders · Antoine Michoud v. Peronne Bernardine Girod

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is an undoubted principle of this court that as between a cestui que trust and trustee and all parties claiming under the trustee, otherwise than by purchase for valuable consideration without notice, all property belonging to a trust, however much it may be changed or altered in its nature or character, and all the fruits of such property, whether it is in its original or its altered state, continues to be subject to or affected by the trust.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “exercised his power of disposition for his own benefit, that conduct, without more, was”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.