Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 U.S. 435 - Dumbra v. United States

Dumbra v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

268 U.S. 435 · 1925

Citation profile

588
cited by 588 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
27
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

229 federal appellate · 92 district · 182 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 588 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2017 · most notably Terry v. Ohio (1968), Brinegar v. United States (1949)

229 federal appellate · 92 district · 182 state decisions — followed in 27 states

13601925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Stacey v. Emery · Steele v. United States No. 2 · Reid v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 588 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he apparent facts set out in the affidavit are such that a reasonably discreet and prudent man would be led to believe that there was a commission of the offense.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the facts and circumstances before the officer are such as to warrant a man of prudence and caution in believing that the offense has been committed, it is sufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.