Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 U.S. 442 - Knewel v. Egan

Knewel v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis

268 U.S. 442 · 1925

Citation profile

561
cited by 561 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

304 federal appellate · 23 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 561 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Zerbst (1938), Fay v. Noia (1963)

304 federal appellate · 23 district · 66 state decisions — followed in 16 states

149019251930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royall · Frank v. Mangum · 'The Ku-Klux Cases' Yarbrough · Ex Parte Tobias Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 561 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * It has been uniformly held by this court that the sufficiency of an indictment cannot be reviewed in habeas corpus proceedings.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the judgment of state courts in criminal cases will not be reviewed on habeas corpus merely because some right under the Constitution of the United States is alleged to have been denied to the person convicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is restrained of his liberty by judgment of a court acting without jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.