United States v. Noce’s Empirical Analysis
268 U.S. 613 · 1925
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2000 · most notably St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South Dakota (1981), Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United States (1927)
22 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Yuginovich · Benedict v. Ratner · Frost v. Wenie · United States v. Greathouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * That hereafter longevity pay for officers in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Public Health Service, and Coast and Geodetic Survey shall be based on the total of all service in any or all of said services.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““ Sec. 11. * * * Provided, That hereafter longevity pay for officers in the Army, Navy, Marino Corps, Coast Guard, Public Health Service, and Coast and Geodetic Survey shall be based on the total of all service in any or all of said services.” (Italics ours.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“discriminat[ed] against the civilian appointee who pays for his own preliminary education and in favor of the graduate of the Military Academy who is educated for his commission at the expense of the Government.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.