Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

268 U.S. App. D.C. 304

Hammon v. Barry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 18, 1988

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · decided 1988-03-18

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1988

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Upon consideration of this Court’s en banc orders of February 26, 1988, and March 4, 1988, in Nos. 86-5377 and 86-5378, Joseph J. Ledoux v. District of Columbia, granting the joint motion to remand and dismiss, and vacating this Court’s opinion, it is

¶3ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the order of November 20, 1987, 833 F.2d 367, granting rehearing by the Court en banc in Hammon be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

¶4A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge MIKVA, joined by Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judges ROBINSON, RUTH BAD-ER GINSBURG and EDWARDS, is attached.

¶5Dissenting Statement Accompanying Order Revoking Previous Order to Rehear Hammon v. Barry (No. 85-5669) En Banc.

¶6Dissenting Statement filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA, in which Chief Judge WALD, and Circuit Judges ROBINSON, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and EDWARDS join.

/268/usappdc/304 · .json · Public domain