Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Va. 222 - Gamache v. Allen

Gamache v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coe v. Commonwealth · Walker v. Commonwealth · Coleman v. Blankenship Oil Corp. · Bradley v. Commonwealth · Burns v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence that is factually relevant may be excluded from the jury's consideration if the probative value of that evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n determining whether [relevant] evidence should be admitted, the circuit court must apply a balancing test to assess the probative value of the evidence and its prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rests within the sound discretion of the circuit court and will only be disturbed on appeal upon a showing of an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.