Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Va. 233 - Powell v. Com.

Powell v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Melka Marine, Inc. v. United States · Commonwealth v. Hudson · Beavers v. Commonwealth · Powers v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t was within the province of the trier of fact to consider all the evidence and resolve any conflicts. In this case, evidence that no gun was found conflicts with Powell's statements and actions during the commission of the offenses. The trier of fact resolved this conflict against Powell, and in doing so, necessarily concluded that Powell had a gun. In other words, the resolution of the factual conflict in this manner established beyond a reasonable doubt that Powell had a gun. Based on this record we cannot say that the judgment of the trial court was plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[m]oving back and forth in a nervous, fidgety manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not to move 'and won't nobody get hurt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.