Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 268 Va. 532 - Lindeman v. Lesnick

Lindeman v. Lesnick’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gazette, Inc. v. Harris · Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon Associates · Lockheed Information Management Systems Co. v. Maximus, Inc. · Penick v. Ratcliffe · Watt v. McKelvie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absolute privilege, sometimes called judicial privilege, is broad in scope and applies to communications made in proceedings pending in a court or before a quasi-judicial body .... If the communication is made in such a judicial proceeding, it need only be relevant and pertinent to the case to be protected by the privilege .... The reason for the rule of absolute privilege in judicial proceedings is to encourage unrestricted speech in litigation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he maker of an absolutely privileged communication is accorded complete immunity from liability even though the communication is made maliciously and with knowledge that it is false.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “permit[ting] defamatory communications to be made with impunity merely upon an assertion that litigation might be subsequently initiated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.