Ausen v. Moriarty’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2012
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co. · Maurer v. Northwestern Iron Co. · Voss v. Tittel · Batson v. Nichols · Caskey v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[I]f the effect of the amendment is to correct the name under which the right party is sued, it will be allowed. However, if it is to bring in a new party, it will be refused.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““The giving of the notice is a material thing. It is made a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action to recover damages.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.