State v. Rines’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1451 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 19 U.S.C. § 1615 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968)
Relies on Kordel v. United States · The President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. Dandridge · Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Rankin · Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness · 56 Wash. 2d 846 - State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 331 not only prohibits the introduction into interstate commerce by the maker of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded, but the receipt thereof and delivery of the same for pay. It also prohibits the alteration of the labeling with respect to a drug held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce. Section 333 provides penalties_ This federal Act places an obligation on both the manufacturer who ships interstate and the purchaser for resale to truthfully “brand” and maintain quality (no adulteration) as represented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is a matter of judicial notice that the consumer public daily accepts as true and relies upon the assertions in labels and brands appearing on packages displayed at the supermarket.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reemer v. State“that every man in his private and official character, does his duty until the contrary is proved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.