¶1*984In an action to restrain the violation of a covenant against engaging in certain business in a specified area, plaintiff appeals, from an order denying his motion to preclude defendants because of their alleged failure to comply with a prior order directing the service of a bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
269 A.D. 983
Friedman v. Halpern
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1945-11-05
Decided 1945-11-05