Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 Ala. 579 - Smith v. Lancaster

Smith v. Lancaster’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2002

13 state decisions

80195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reynolds v. Collier · State Ex Rel. Ward v. Henry · State Ex Rel. Brooks v. Gullatt · Byrd v. State Ex Rel. Colquett · Walden v. City of Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We find nothing on the face of the bill indicating that the difference in population is arbitrarily fixed, nor do we find anything that would justify a conclusion that it is not fixed in good faith and is not 'reasonably related to the purpose to be effected and to the difference in population which forms the basis thereof.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"A general law within the meaning of this article is a law which applies to the whole State; a local law is a law which applies to any political subdivision or subdivisions of the State less than the whole; * * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"According to the 1950 decennial census, Etowah County had a population of 93,892. So, if the 1960 census shows an increase in its population of as little as 109 it will not then be subject to the Act ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.