Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 Ala. 632

Erwin v. Erwin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1959

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1959-10-08

Relies on Wetzel v. Hobbs · Carpenter v. Carpenter · Marine Insurance Co. v. Strecker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1959-10-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1986

7 state decisions

401959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MERRILL, Justice.

¶1There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered, and it is so ordered. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So.2d 632; Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; Stidham v. Stidham, 264 Ala. 195, 86 So.2d 294; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639, and Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

¶2Affirmed.

LAWSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.
/269/ala/632 · .json · Public domain