Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 ARK 30 - Gilmer v. State

Gilmer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Breakfield v. State · State v. Bocksnick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the facts of this situation, we are able to distinguish it from Breakfield v. State, supra, and Bocksnick v. State, supra. In those cases the officers were concerned only with attempting to arrest the parties involved in the incident. In the present case the officer encountered appellant while he was in the performance of his official duties in going to investigate another incident in which appellant happened to be a participant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Resisting arrest. — (1) A person commits the offense of resisting arrest if he knowingly resists a person known by him to be a law enforcement officer effecting an arrest."(Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.