Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 Ark. 324 - Clinkscale v. State

Clinkscale v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Marshall v. State (2000), Malone v. State (1987)

24 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Finch v. State · Hickey v. State · Mason v. Morel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is nothing at all to the State’s argument that because an information alleges two or more convictions, more than two can be admitted against a criminal defendant. Allegations of prior convictions are just like essential elements of a crime, only those that are alleged can be used.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.