Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 Ark. 506 - Haynes v. State

Haynes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · McDonald v. United States · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a "basic principle of Fourth Amendment law" that searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable. Yet it is also well settled that objects such as weapons or contraband found in a public place may be seized by the police without a warrant. The seizure of property in plain view involves no invasion of privacy and is presumptively reasonable, assuming that there is probable cause to associate the property with criminal activity. The distinction between a warrantless seizure in an open area and such a seizure on private premises was plainly stated in G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338, 354 , 97 S.Ct. 619, 629 , 50 L.Ed.2d 530 : * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.