In Re Nott’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-Appellant · Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes) · Max Recovery, Inc. v. Nguyen Hong Than (In Re Nguyen Hong Than) · In Re Euerle · In Re Meeks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the case is pending, the post-petition property ... [is] added to the estate until confirmation, the event that triggers [section] 1327(b) and “vests” the property of the estate in the debtor. That is, the property interests comprising the pre-confirmation estate property are transferred to the debtor at confirmation, and this “vesting” is free and clear of the claims or interests of creditors provided for by the plan, [section] 1327(b), (c). Finally, the property of the estate once again accumulates property by operation of [section] 1306(a) until the case is “closed, dismissed, or converted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Waldron v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.