In Re Guild’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
May 2007
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 707
Relies on Harshbarger v. Pees · In Re: Luisa Anes · New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Villarie · In Re Gonzales · In Re Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is an inherent unfairness in adopting a per se rule....’’); In re Awuku, 248 B.R. 21, 32 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re King“there is no meaningful difference between 401(k) loan repayment and contribution”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.