Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 CALAPP2D 461 - People v. Lopez

People v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1980

16 state decisions

140196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ker v. State of California · Miller v. United States · 68 Cal. 2d 299 - People v. Rosales · 67 Cal. 2d 586 - People v. Gastelo · People v. Reeves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * [T]he constitutionally proscribed trickery is that in which an officer obtains entry by subterfuge to a place where he has no right to be. Stratagem in itself is not illegal; it may be used, for example, to gain entry in order to effect a lawful arrest.” (Emphasis in original.) People v. Lopez, 269 Cal.App.2d 461 , 74 Cal.Rptr. 740 at 743 (1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.