¶1MEMORANDUM DECISIONS
¶2Appeal from tbe Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Bloyd G. Copeman and William E. Emerson. From a decision of tbe Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority of invention to Emerson, Copeman appeals.
¶3Affirmed.
¶4Milans & Milans and C. J. O’Neill, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
¶5C. W. Fairbank, of New York City, for appellee.
¶7This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents awarding priority of invention to appellee. We have examined the record, and find no error. The decisions of all the tribunals below are in accord. No novel questions of law are presented. We find it unnecessary, therefore, to enter into a review of the facts, which are carefully considered in the opinions below. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed,