Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 F. 1020

Docket No. 1334.

In re Kuhn

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted November 15, 1920.

Decided January 3, 1921.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1921-01-03

In the matter of the application of Harry A. Kuhn for á patent. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims, the applicant appeals.

2 counsel of record

Affirmed · Decided 1921-01-03

¶1Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. In the matter of the application of Harry A. Kuhn for á patent. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims, the applicant appeals.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3R. D. Totten, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

¶4T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of. Patents.

¶5ROBB, Associate Justice.

¶6Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing six claims for a patent on a machine for mining coal; the ground of the decision being that no patentable advance has been made over the prior art. We have carefully considered the points made in appellant’s brief, as elucidated by his argument at the hearing of the case, and, being convinced that the decision of the Patent Office tribunals was right, we affirm it upon the grounds stated by them. Affirmed.

/269/f1d/1020 · .json · Public domain