Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 F. 1020

Docket No. 1323.

In re Schweinert

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted November 8, 1920.

Decided January 3, 1921.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1921-01-03

In the matter of the application of Maximilian Charles Sehweinert and another for the patent of a tire valve. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing to grant the patent, applicants appeal.

2 counsel of record

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1921-01-03

¶1Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. In the matter of the application of Maximilian Charles Sehweinert and another for the patent of a tire valve. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing to grant the patent, applicants appeal.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3E. V. Myers and G. R. Thompson, both of New York City, and Milans & Milans, of Washington, D. C., for ap*1021pellants.

¶4T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. O., for Commissioner of Patents.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Appeal from the refusal of the Commissioner of Patents to grant a patent for a tire valve. We agree with the Commissioner that the applicant has made no patentable advance over the prior art. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.

/269/f1d/1020 · .json · Public domain