Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 F.1d 472 - Brumbaugh v. Gompers

Brumbaugh v. Gompers’s Empirical Analysis

269 F. 472 · 1920

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1990

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

3019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Northern Pacific Railroad · St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Mulkey · William Lea v. The Polk County Copper Company et al. · 81 N.J. Eq. 389 - Smith v. Spencer · Illinois Steel Co. v. Paczocha

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence is uncontradicted that for a period of more than 30 years the eastern boundary of lot 13 [that of the adverse claimant] was not the line as surveyed for the sale to appellees, but the line claimed by appellants and formed by clearly defined boundaries. In our view, no clearer case of adverse possession could be made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.