Kisovitz v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis
269 F. 866 · 1921
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1944
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellee’s British application, filed February 9', 1916, ancl his United States Application, filed January 16, 1917, fell within the limitations of section 4887, Rev. Stats. (Comp. St. § 9431). This gives the United States application the same force and effect as it would have if it had been filed on the date the British application was filed. Inasmuch as the preliminary steps leading up, to the filing of the British application were found by the tribunals below to have occurred at a time prior to any date- to which appellant can lay claim, and we concur in this finding, appellee must prevail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Broos v. Barton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.