Thome v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
269 F. 995 · 1921
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1936
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Huntington v. Attrill · Knowlton v. Moore · Wong Wing v. United States · Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan · New Jersey v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The broad reason underlying section 8224 is that the government shah not he delayed or interfered with in the collection of its revenues. This is clear from the decisions in the cases wherein the statute has been applied. They relate to exactions properly called taxes; that is, exactions for revenue for the uses of the government.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ledbetter v. Bailey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.