Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 F.2d 108 - Noland v. Commissioner

Noland v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2020
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Whipple v. Commissioner (1963), Recklitis v. Commissioner (1988)

30 federal appellate · 3 district ·

28019591960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welch v. Helvering · Deputy v. du Pont · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Flowers · Interstate Transit Lines v. Commissioner · Burnet v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “every person who works for compensation is engaged in the business of earning his pay”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The business of a corporation, however, is not that of its officers, employees or stockholders. Though the individual stockholder-executive, in his own mind, may identify his interest and business with those of the corporation, they legally are distinct. * * *” 269 F.2d at 111 .”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not arise directly out of the exigencies of the business of the corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.