Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 F.2d 458 - Murrell v. United States

Murrell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

269 F.2d 458 · 1959

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1995

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

6019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Horn · City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. · Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Dorsey · Taylor v. Armstrong · Stuart v. Stephanus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * [W]hen a street or highway is platted on the margin of the grantor's land, a conveyance of the lands bordering the street carries the fee to the entire width of the street unless expressly reserved * * *." (144 Fla. at 3-4, 197 So. at 862)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.