Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 F.2d 841 - Thurber Corp. v. Fairchild Motor Corp.

Thurber Corp. v. Fairchild Motor Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

269 F.2d 841 · 1959

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Rite-Hite Corporation Hmh Hoj Rb We v. Kelley Company Inc (1995), Cook Estate of Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County Florida (2005)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

2301959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n · Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. · Continental Paper Bag Company v. Eastern Paper Bag Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “initially excluded some of [appellant's proffered evidence] altogether, had tentatively ruled that other portions were admissible for limited use, but later declined to permit introduction of any,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “did not have to reoffer it formally at the several stages when introduction would have been pertinent,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sharply brought to the Court's attention and by it articulately rejected,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.