Kim Brown’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Altman, 580 F. Supp. 2d 429 - Hayduk v. City of Johnstown (2008)
1 federal appellate · 21 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) identify the specific supervisory practice or procedure that the supervisor failed to employ, and show that (2) the existing custom and practice without the identified, absent custom or procedure created an unreasonable risk of the ultimate injury, (3) the supervisor was aware that this unreasonable risk existed, (4) the supervisor was indifferent to the risk; and (5) the underling’s violation resulted from the supervisor’s failure to employ that supervisory practice or procedure.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To state a plausible claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must allege sufficient facts demonstrating that (1) the defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous; (2) the defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress; and that (3) the defendant acted intending to cause that person such • distress or with knowledge that such distress was substantially certain to occur. Liability for intentional infliction, of emotional distress has been found only where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible, bounds of decency, and to be regained as.afyocious, and utterly intol erable in a civilized community. In addition, a plaintiff must allege that, he or she suffered some type of resulting physical harm due. to the, defendant’s outrageous conduct, which must be supported by competent medical evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“obviously ... `seized' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.