In Re: John W. Byrd, Jr. Movant’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2009
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Coleman v. Thompson · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state courts of Ohio wasted an opportunity to bring all interested parties to fairness and finality in this matter by refusing out of hand and with no justifiable rationale Byrd's request for discovery and a hearing ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“for the development of a factual record sufficient to permit sua sponte consideration of [his] request to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that a factual basis [did] not exist sufficient to permit the en banc court to entertain the Petitioner's request for a successive filing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.