Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 F. App'x 954

Roan v. Peake

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-02-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2009

Relies on Sanders v. Nicholson · Simmons v. Nicholson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1ORDER

¶2The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court’s November 21, 2007 order and requests that the court summarily affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Roan v. Principi, 01-1996, 2003 WL 23095241 (Dec. 12, 2003). William B. Roan, Jr. has not responded.

¶3This case was stayed pending the court’s disposition in Sanders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881 (Fed.Cir.2007) and its companion case Simmons v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 892 (Fed.Cir.2007). In Sanders, this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. Id. at 891.

¶4The Secretary concedes that the only issue raised in this appeal is identical to the issue decided in Sandersand Simmons. Under these circumstances, summary affirmance is appropriate.

¶5Accordingly,

¶6IT IS ORDERED THAT:

¶7(1) The stay of proceedings is lifted.

¶8(2) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

¶9(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

/269/fappx/954 · .json · Public domain