Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 F. Supp. 2d 1162 - Aaron v. Target Corp.

269 F. Supp. 2d 1162 - Aaron v. Target Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Elrod v. Burns · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “full force and effect until such time as the matter of a permanent injunction is heard by the Court, or this dispute is otherwise finally resolved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there was no ongoing state judicial proceeding until after this case was initiated and plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction was filed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “plaintiffs do not have an adequate opportunity to litigate their constitutional claims in the state court proceeding,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.