Gonzalez v. Hasty’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Davis v. Passman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Recently, the Supreme Court reiterated that courts should not imply rights and remedies as a matter of course, 'no matter how desirable that might be as a policy matter, or how compatible with the statute [or constitutional provision].'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Given the notable change in the Court's approach to recognizing implied causes of action, ... the Court has made clear that expanding the Bivens remedy is now a 'disfavored' judicial activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]here is no precedent suggesting that the unavailability of money is a factor that carries any weight in determining the expansion of a Bivens remedy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.