269 Ga. App. 653 - Banks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mize v. State · Ware v. State · 255 Ga. App. 58 - Morgan v. State · 245 Ga. App. 391 - Hood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is permissible under Georgia law for an indictment to allege that a defendant has been known by an alias. It is also permissible for a jury to hear or see the allegation pertaining to the alias, and such a reference or disclosure does not, in and of itself, place the defendant's character in issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“fails in light of the direct evidence of the victim identifying him[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.