Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 ILL 459 - Price v. Solberg

Price v. Solberg’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1957
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1957

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

3019151920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greig v. Russell · Brizzolara v. Mosher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contract being made a part of the bill, if any facts alleged in the bill differ from the facts stated in the contract the latter must control. The demurrer will not admit the truth of such inconsistent allegations of the bill. (Greig v. Russell, 115 Ill. 483 ; Armstrong v. Building Ass’n, 176 id. 298.) The only question in this case is as to the proper construction of this contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.