State v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited
2 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chiles v. State · State v. Sisk · Battrick v. State · Peterson v. Garvey Elevators, Inc. · 22 Kan. App. 2d 843 - Payton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If an inmate is sentenced to prison for a crime committed after July 1, 1993, while on parole or conditional release for a crime committed prior to July 1,1993, the old sentence shall be converted into a determinate sentence and will run consecutive to the new sentence as follows: (1) Twelve months for class C, D or E felonies or die conditional release date whichever is shorter; (2) 36 mondis for class A or B felonies or die conditional release date whichever is shorter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mueller“The situation of a defendant convicted of a crime committed while on parole is different than that of a defendant returned to prison as a technical parole violator. The former will face an additional sentence, usually to be served consecutive to the sentence for which he or she was on parole. The latter, who will not face a new sentence, after being found in violation of the conditions of parole will continue on parole, be re voked, or be subjected to any order the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pichon v. Bruce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.