State v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 125 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably State v. Holgate (2000), State v. Hebert (2004)
4 federal appellate · 125 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Johnson · City of Boerne v. Flores · State v. Moncla · State v. Henson · State v. Saleem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, the standard of review is whether, after review of all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 571 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000).”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`adequately conveys the concept that "premeditation”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Martis · State v. Stanley“to have thought over the matter beforehand”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.