Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

269 Kan. 929

In re Stephens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 6, 2000

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 2000-09-06

Relies on In Re Stephens · In re Stephens

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-09-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 189 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably State v. Gould (2001), Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. Nielander (2003)

1 district · 187 state decisions

1460200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In a letter dated August 21, 2000, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent David W. Stephens, of Garden City, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 246).

¶2On October 31, 1997, the respondent was placed on two years’ supervised probation by this court. In re Stephens, 263 Kan. 221, 946 P.2d 1379 (1997). On March 6, 1998, the respondent’s supervised probation was revoked by this court. In re Stephens, 264 Kan. 245, 954 P.2d 1100 (1998). At the time the respondent surrendered his license, a formal complaint had been filed by the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which there were five separate complaints. There were allegations of lack of diligence and failure to communicate with clients. Many of the allegations of misconduct occurred during the time the respondent was on supervised probation.

¶3This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

¶4It Is Therefore Ordered that David W. Stephens be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

¶5It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of David W. Stephens from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

¶6It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1999 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 250).

/269/kan/929 · .json · Public domain