¶1
(concurring in result).
I concur in the ■ result, but do not approve of the examination of the record in the previous case.
¶2*26
I do not understand that we may,
sua sponte,
look into a record in a previous case in order to find a fact upon which to predicate an argument or base a conclusion. And this is especially true where the parties are not the same.
Potter, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J..
