In Re Probasco’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1957
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hawker v. People of New York · Thompson v. Smith · State ex rel. Makris v. Superior Court · 124 Cal. App. 752 - People v. O'Rourke · Matter of Mandell v. Board of Regents
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ... . Furthermore, by using existing local machinery, the Legislature was attempting to provide a convenient method of hearing for the individual without the added expense to the state of setting up new boards or machinery.” (In re Probasco, supra.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kouni
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.