269 Mich. App. 414 - People v. Endres’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There was sufficient evidence to conclude that because of defendant's threats, his victim might have been dissuaded from coming forward with accusations and testimony, thus preventing the discovery and prosecution of defendant's crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.