State v. Haskins’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2020
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1152
Relies on United States v. Wheeler · Williams v. Lee · Montana v. United States · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Duro v. Reina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If at any time during the course of the proceeding it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with any of the provisions of this part or any order issued pursuant to this part, the court may impose any sanction that it finds just under the circumstances, including but not limited to: (1) ordering disclosure of the information not previously disclosed; (2) granting a continuance; (3) holding a witness, party, or counsel in contempt for an intentional violation; (4) precluding a party from calling a witness , offering evidence, or raising a defense not disclosed; or (5) declaring a mistrial when necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Berg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.