Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 269 Neb. 499 - State v. Rabourn

State v. Rabourn’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc. · State v. Kipf · Hass v. Neth · State v. Burke · State v. Worm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “i.e., when the statute is unconstitutional in a substantial portion of cases to which it applies. Id. Stated another way, in order to prevail upon a facial attack to the constitutionality of a statute, the challenger must show either that every application of the statute creates an impermissible risk of suppression of ideas or that the statute is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.