269 N.J. Super. 107 - Simulation Systems v. Oldham’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Eisenstadt v. Baker · SHV Coal, Inc. v. Continental Grain Co. · Annette Heyman, Individually v. Robert S. Kline · Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. Mulei · Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. Gaffney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If an agent is paid a salary apportioned to periods of time, or compensation apportioned to the completion of specified items of work, he is entitled to receive the stipulated compensation for periods or items properly completed before his renunciation or discharge. This is true even if, because of unfaithfulness or insubordination, the agent forfeits his compensation for subsequent periods or items.” [Simulation Sys., supra, 269 N.J.Super. at 111 , 634 A.2d 1034 (quoting Restatement (Second), supra, § 456 comment b).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a principal properly discharges an agent for breach of contract, ... the principal is subject to liability to pay to the agent, with a deduction for the loss caused the principal by the breach of contract: (a) the agreed compensation for services properly rendered for which the compensation is apportioned in the contract, whether or not the agent’s breach is wilful and deliberate!.] [Id. § 456.] 6”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A serious violation of a duty of loyalty or seriously disobedient conduct is a wilful and deliberate breach of the contract of service by the agent, and, in accordance with the rule stated in Section 456, the agent thereby loses his right to obtain compensation for prior services, compensation for which has not been apportioned. [Restatement (Second), supra, § 469 comment b.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.