269 N.J. Super. 86 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Calandra · Branzburg v. Hayes · United States v. Williams · Bonanno v. United States · Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The prosecutor's disclosure obligation is limited to evidence which, if believed, would establish in itself that [the defendant] had not committed the crime such as a confession by another to the crime or evidence that `the accused was nowhere near the scene of the crime when it occurred.' Even then, consideration will be given to the likely reliability of the non-disclosed evidence." [ Smith, supra, 269 N.J. Super. at 97 , 634 A. 2d 576 (quoting ibid. ).]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“obligation to give the grand jury evidence in the prosecutor's possession which clearly exculpates a defendant, that is, evidence that directly negates a defendant's guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“U.S. v. Williams, 504 U.S. [36] at 51, 112 S.Ct. [1735] at 1744, 118 L.Ed. 2d [352] at 368. But we think the grand jury cannot function as a shield if the prosecutor does not present evidence that clearly negates the guilt of a defendant. See State v. Gaughran, 260 N.J. Super. at 290 , 615 A. 2d 1293 (objective medical evidence that alleged rape by defendant did not occur). Cf. State v. Perry, 124 N.J. at 168 , 590 A. 2d 624 . [ Id. at 97.] We also quoted LaFave & Israel, 2 Criminal Procedure § 15.4(d) (1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.