State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1994
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Best · State v. Belt · State v. Austin · 50 Wis. 2d 53 - Milburn v. State · State v. Rober
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not find it necessary to decide whether such ‘general prejudice’ can be grounds for ordering a change of venue since Defendant did not meet his burden of showing that he could not receive a fair trial in Roberts County.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. White v. Solem“[i]t [is] not necessary for the State to prove precisely how defendant participated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Leapley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.